Solomon's biography suggests that art Rockwell was driven by feelings of pedophilia and homosexuality, and his self-absorption has led to the death of family members.
Thomas says the biographer spent only two or three hours to interview at a restaurant and gave him no opportunity to respond about inaccuracies in the manuscript. This is unfortunate, because Thomas is the person who worked most closely with Rockwell on his famous autobiography
. "This is a huge work of literary snow," he said.
granddaughter Abigail NR characterizes the book as "salacious lies under the cover of a well-documented book."
Thomas says the biographer spent only two or three hours to interview at a restaurant and gave him no opportunity to respond about inaccuracies in the manuscript. This is unfortunate, because Thomas is the person who worked most closely with Rockwell on his famous autobiography
granddaughter Abigail NR characterizes the book as "salacious lies under the cover of a well-documented book."
Wake Forest University professor Patrick Toner dissects also representation Rockwell's book and questioned the award of Solomon in his detailed article online "False Portrait." Toner said Solomon's arguments "are deeply flawed, and has a pronounced tendency either distort or ignore evidence to the contrary to his claims."
I did not read the book, but I read the biographical article that Ms. Solomon wrote in Smithsonian. Rather than being a humanizing portrait of Rockwell, I find it is full of inaccuracies and innuendo, and I was surprised he got done by ladies-Smithsonian magazine.
I think the Norman Rockwell museum has made a mistake in approving the book and hosting its launch. While it is commendable for the museum to provide a forum for a variety of viewpoints on Rockwell, it is also essential for them as the Rockwell link exchange, to set the record straight when false or misleading claims are made about the man, especially when those requests were blindly accepted by the mainstream press. I hope the museum will make a statement clarifying its position and correct the record.
Nobody wants a sanitized image of Rockwell, but we do not want a truthful.
I think the Norman Rockwell museum has made a mistake in approving the book and hosting its launch. While it is commendable for the museum to provide a forum for a variety of viewpoints on Rockwell, it is also essential for them as the Rockwell link exchange, to set the record straight when false or misleading claims are made about the man, especially when those requests were blindly accepted by the mainstream press. I hope the museum will make a statement clarifying its position and correct the record.
Nobody wants a sanitized image of Rockwell, but we do not want a truthful.
----
additional Lectures
• Huffington Post, Sherman Yellen, who knew Rockwell, Solomon described the portrait as a "glass distortion of view carnival Norman Rockwell "
• online rebuttal article by Patrick toner" False Portrait.
• In a New York Times review of the book, Garrison Keillor characterizes Rockwell friendliest and issues sexualized portrayal of Solomon.
additional Lectures
• Huffington Post, Sherman Yellen, who knew Rockwell, Solomon described the portrait as a "glass distortion of view carnival Norman Rockwell "
• online rebuttal article by Patrick toner" False Portrait.
• In a New York Times review of the book, Garrison Keillor characterizes Rockwell friendliest and issues sexualized portrayal of Solomon.
tactics interview • Solomon were challenged previously by others, including Ira This American Life. glass
• Why Solomon Q & A column was slashed to the New York Times
disastrous public interview • Solomon with Steve Martin
• Why Solomon Q & A column was slashed to the New York Times
disastrous public interview • Solomon with Steve Martin
• Audio Interview: Family Of Norman Rockwell Angered Over findings in New Rockwell Biography
• book: American mirror: the life and Art of Norman Rockwell
• Amazon reviews book online
• Amazon reviews book online